<h1 class="post-title entry-title" style="text-align: center;">Plentyoffish Is Biased</h1>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="https://media.istockphoto.com/id/958622772/es/vector/coraz%C3%B3n-en-gancho-de-pesca.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=D8V7TesQwyuiTRKUlz57q3wBySeNBEr8pq9FpJErt5k=" alt="" width="800" /></p>
<p>A while back, the dating website Plentyoffish deleted a post I made in the forum in which I commented on the unoriginality of many women's profiles. It seems that freedom of speech is not permitted when you have a politically incorrect opinion critical of the actions of some. I had read about this sort of thing happening to other guys, so I'm not too surprised it happened to me as well. But fortunately I saved a copy of the offending post given that it might just end up in oblivion under the heavy-handedness of the feminazi forum moderators. Here is the post below.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Sponsored Ads</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Looking For POF Alternative Dating? </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-Kingdom-dating-service.html?page=25">British Plenty Of Fish Alternative Dating</a><br /> <a href="https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/United-States-dating-service.html?page=25">American POF Alternative Free Dating</a><br /> <a href="https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/Spain-dating-service.html?page=25">POF App in Spain</a><br /> <a href="https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/Canada-dating-service.html?page=25">POF Alternative Site in Canada</a><br /> <a href="https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/Australia-dating-service.html?page=25">Australian POF</a><br /> <a href="https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/Germany-dating-service.html?page=25">POF Alternative In Germany</a></p>
<h2>The Generic Profile Problem: Lack of Originality in Women's Profiles</h2>
<p>I have read many women's profiles and have found that a great deal of them sound generic and unoriginal. The same type of themes keep coming up over and over, such as looking for Mr. Right, looking for butterflies, like to have fun, enjoy walks on the beach, enjoy nice dinners, want a guy who can make me laugh, and if they're from the Toronto area must like dogs. Don't get me wrong, these are all nice things, but the problem is that there is a lack of individuality. Furthermore, these type of profiles don't give guys anything to work with in terms of writing a response. And if they do respond it's almost certain that the response is going to be unoriginal as well. In reality, it tends to reflect the unoriginality of the profile which they are responding to.</p>
<p>And it's funny, one of the biggest complaints women have is that the guys write simple boring responses which lack substance. In my opinion you cannot complain about that if the profile you wrote is equally lacking in substance. But just for the sake of argument, let's imagine what a man could say in response to the above themes. "I'm also looking for butterflies. Yes I like dogs too, and I can make you laugh...let's talk." Now this would of course sound fake. Result: delete.</p>
<p>Now, I've read a few profiles where the women really make the effort to dig deep into who they are. They aren't trying to follow convention like most people do and basically just tell the truth about themselves. And the result is a profile worth responding to. Learning from <a href="https://blog.loveawake.com/best-ways-to-find-single-women-online/" rel="dofollow">best ways to find single women online</a> teaches us that quality profiles with genuine detail attract quality responses. When profiles show effort and authenticity, they naturally inspire more thoughtful engagement from men seeking real connection.</p>
<h2>Platform Censorship and Bias: When Honest Criticism Gets Deleted</h2>
<p>The other thing I've noticed is that the more sexy pictures a woman has up, the greater the chance that she will write a generic unoriginal profile. But these women are hardly crying for attention since the pictures are all the bait that's needed for most guys. I think if guys make a point of only messaging women who write good profiles with sufficient detail and originality then you would see things become much more balanced around here. And both sides would benefit.</p>
<p>So the question becomes, how does one speak out against something that he or she knows to be true but which may make some people uncomfortable. The fact is, the truth sometimes IS uncomfortable. That's life. But you can't censor honest opinion just to protect the sensitivities of certain groups of people. But this isn't the first incident I've experienced with Plentyoffish. They deleted another one of my posts in the past which basically said that men should stop chasing after women. Apparently, whether a thread is deleted or not is based on community vote. Sounds pretty democratic right? But the problem is that the community members (e.g., the moderators) are not democratically minded.</p>
<p>Understanding <a href="https://blog.loveawake.com/whats-the-best-online-dating-profile-picture-we-asked-a-real-guy/" rel="dofollow">what's the best online dating profile picture we asked a real guy</a> highlights the critical importance of genuine presentation in online dating. Yet platforms often suppress discussions about profile authenticity when that critique might be perceived as critical of women—even when the criticism is constructive and aimed at improving the dating experience for everyone.</p>
<h2>The Business Model Behind Discrimination: Why Platforms Favor Women</h2>
<p>The site, in particular the forums, are full of anti-male vitriol and pro-female platitudes. It's something I always noticed and I figured at the time it was just the result of unbalanced points of view. But now I'm convinced that it's in large part the result of censoring.</p>
<p>Economically speaking, it makes sense for the site owner—Markus "sell out" Frind—to structure the site so that it panders to women. This will lure more women to the site. And where the women go legions of men will be sure to follow. This means more ad revenue since the majority of the members are always men. For every woman that he can get to sign up, something like 2-3 men will follow. It's a brilliant business model. But it's also very exploitative, using the weakness and desperation of many men as a market tool to drive up profits. And he can tout the fact that it's a free site all he wants. But in fact, there is a price to be paid. It is paid by the men who are on the receiving end of the fraudulent and discriminatory practices of the site.</p>
<h2>Authentic Connection Over Algorithm: Finding Real Profiles</h2>
<p>The reality is that platforms like Plentyoffish have created an ecosystem where mediocrity is rewarded and criticism is silenced. Women with minimal effort can attract attention through photos alone, while men who seek something more genuine are left frustrated. And when anyone—male or female—dares to point out these uncomfortable truths, the censorship hammer comes down. This isn't about protecting users; it's about protecting a profitable business model. Learning from <a href="https://blog.loveawake.com/your-cheat-sheet-on-how-to-date-women-outside-the-us/" rel="dofollow">your cheat sheet on how to date women outside the us</a> reveals that the best approach is to seek out platforms and people who value authenticity over algorithms. When dating sites prioritize genuine connections over engagement metrics driven by low-quality profiles, everyone benefits. Men should respond by voting with their membership—support platforms that encourage authentic expression and refuse to censor honest dialogue about improving the dating experience.</p>